Comparison

Korma spice paste vs Tikka Masala Spice Paste

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientKorma spice pasteTikka Masala Spice Paste
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 229 kcal 270 kcal
Fat 15.5 g 22.9 g
Saturated fat 2.6 g 1.7 g
Sugars 9.2 g 0.8 g
Salt 4.8 g 4.7 g
Fiber 6 g 6.8 g
Protein 3.1 g 3 g
Additives13
AllergensMustardMustard

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Korma spice paste has 15% fewer calories (229 kcal vs 270 kcal).
  • Korma spice paste has 32% less fat (15.5 g vs 22.9 g).
  • Tikka Masala Spice Paste has 35% less saturated fat (1.7 g vs 2.6 g).
  • Tikka Masala Spice Paste has 91% less sugar (0.8 g vs 9.2 g).
  • Tikka Masala Spice Paste has 12% more fiber (6.8 g vs 6 g).
  • Korma spice paste is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Korma spice paste

water, ground spices (12%) [coriander (4%), turmeric, spices, paprika, cumin, fenugreek], rapeseed oil (11%), sugar, oconcentrated tomato purée (5%), salt, maize flour, p ginger purée, garlic purée, 2desiccated coconut (3%), acid (acetic acid), dried ponion, mustard powder, dried coriander leaf,

Tikka Masala Spice Paste

Water, Ground Spices (19%) [Turmeric, Paprika (4%), Cumin (3%), Coriander (3%), Spices], Rapeseed Oil, Salt, Maize Flour, Acids (Acetic Acid, Citric Acid), Tamarind, Garlic Powder, Cumin Seed, Paprika Extract, Dried Fenugreek Leaf, Dried Coriander Leaf.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Korma spice paste or Tikka Masala Spice Paste?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Korma spice paste has fewer calories: 229 kcal versus 270 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Tikka Masala Spice Paste has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 9.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons