Kombu Royal vs Ensalada de algas
Overall, Ensalada de algas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kombu Royal | Ensalada de algas |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 146 kcal | 26 kcal |
| Fat | 1.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 9.2 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | 29 g | 36 g |
| Protein | 10 g | 2.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ensalada de algas has 82% fewer calories (26 kcal vs 146 kcal).
- Ensalada de algas has 55% less fat (0.5 g vs 1.1 g).
- Ensalada de algas has no saturated fat, while Kombu Royal has 0.3 g.
- Ensalada de algas has no sugar, while Kombu Royal has 0.5 g.
- Ensalada de algas has 95% less salt (0.4 g vs 9.2 g).
- Ensalada de algas has 19% more fiber (36 g vs 29 g).
- Kombu Royal has 79% more protein (10 g vs 2.1 g).
- Ensalada de algas has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Kombu Royal
algue marine* (Saccharina latissima). *Issue de l'agriculture biologique.
Ensalada de algas
Ingredients*: Algue laitue de mer (Ulva spp.), algue wakame (Undaria pinnatifida) et algue nori (Porphyra spp.),
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kombu Royal or Ensalada de algas?
Overall, Ensalada de algas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ensalada de algas has fewer calories: 26 kcal versus 146 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ensalada de algas has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.