Kombu Royal vs Ensalada de algas
Overall, Ensalada de algas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kombu Royal | Ensalada de algas |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 160 kcal | 26 kcal |
| Fat | 1.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 9.1 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | 29.3 g | 36 g |
| Protein | 11.7 g | 2.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ensalada de algas has 84% fewer calories (26 kcal vs 160 kcal).
- Ensalada de algas has 58% less fat (0.5 g vs 1.2 g).
- Ensalada de algas has 95% less salt (0.4 g vs 9.1 g).
- Ensalada de algas has 19% more fiber (36 g vs 29.3 g).
- Kombu Royal has 82% more protein (11.7 g vs 2.1 g).
Ingredients
Kombu Royal
Kombu royal *( Saccharina latissima*) (algue marine brune déshydratée) *issu de l'agriculture biologique
Ensalada de algas
Ingredients*: Algue laitue de mer (Ulva spp.), algue wakame (Undaria pinnatifida) et algue nori (Porphyra spp.),
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kombu Royal or Ensalada de algas?
Overall, Ensalada de algas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ensalada de algas has fewer calories: 26 kcal versus 160 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kombu Royal has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.