Kombu Royal vs Kombu Royal
Overall, Kombu Royal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kombu Royal | Kombu Royal |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | d |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 160 kcal | 146 kcal |
| Fat | 1.2 g | 1.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 9.1 g | 9.2 g |
| Fiber | 29.3 g | 29 g |
| Protein | 11.7 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kombu Royal has no sugar, while Kombu Royal has 0.5 g.
- Kombu Royal has 15% more protein (11.7 g vs 10 g).
Ingredients
Kombu Royal
Kombu royal *( Saccharina latissima*) (algue marine brune déshydratée) *issu de l'agriculture biologique
Kombu Royal
algue marine* (Saccharina latissima). *Issue de l'agriculture biologique.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kombu Royal or Kombu Royal?
Overall, Kombu Royal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kombu Royal has fewer calories: 146 kcal versus 160 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kombu Royal has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.