Comparison
Kokosraspeln vs Cocco grattuggiato
Overall, Kokosraspeln has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kokosraspeln | Cocco grattuggiato |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 635 kcal | 681 kcal |
| Fat | 59 g | 65 g |
| Saturated fat | 55.7 g | 58 g |
| Sugars | 7.6 g | 7.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 16.3 g | 18 g |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 7.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cocco grattuggiato has 11% more protein (7.5 g vs 6.7 g).
- Kokosraspeln has the better Nutri-Score.
- Kokosraspeln is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Cocco grattuggiato lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Kokosraspeln
Kokosraspel
Cocco grattuggiato
Cocco disidratato, conservante, _anidride solforosa_.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kokosraspeln or Cocco grattuggiato?
Overall, Kokosraspeln has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kokosraspeln has fewer calories: 635 kcal versus 681 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cocco grattuggiato has less sugar: 7.5 g versus 7.6 g per 100 g.