Kokos Chips Med Saltet Karamel vs Kokosraspeln
Overall, Kokosraspeln has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kokos Chips Med Saltet Karam... | Kokosraspeln |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 648 kcal | 635 kcal |
| Fat | 58 g | 59 g |
| Saturated fat | 51 g | 55.7 g |
| Sugars | 18 g | 7.6 g |
| Salt | 2.2 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 12 g | 16.3 g |
| Protein | 6.5 g | 6.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kokosraspeln has 58% less sugar (7.6 g vs 18 g).
- Kokosraspeln has 99% less salt (0 g vs 2.2 g).
- Kokosraspeln has 26% more fiber (16.3 g vs 12 g).
- Kokosraspeln has the better Nutri-Score.
- Kokosraspeln is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Kokos Chips Med Saltet Karamel
noix de coco* (84%), sucre de fleur de coco* (15%), sel de mer Français (1 %). *ingrédient issu de l'agriculture biologique. Utilisation suggérée: 35g
Kokosraspeln
Kokosraspel
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kokos Chips Med Saltet Karamel or Kokosraspeln?
Overall, Kokosraspeln has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kokosraspeln has fewer calories: 635 kcal versus 648 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kokosraspeln has less sugar: 7.6 g versus 18 g per 100 g.