Comparison
Kokosmehl vs Kokosraspeln
Overall, Kokosmehl has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kokosmehl | Kokosraspeln |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 361 kcal | 635 kcal |
| Fat | 15 g | 59 g |
| Saturated fat | 14 g | 55.7 g |
| Sugars | 18 g | 7.6 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 35 g | 16.3 g |
| Protein | 20 g | 6.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kokosmehl has 43% fewer calories (361 kcal vs 635 kcal).
- Kokosmehl has 75% less fat (15 g vs 59 g).
- Kokosmehl has 75% less saturated fat (14 g vs 55.7 g).
- Kokosraspeln has 58% less sugar (7.6 g vs 18 g).
- Kokosmehl has 53% more fiber (35 g vs 16.3 g).
- Kokosmehl has 67% more protein (20 g vs 6.7 g).
- Kokosraspeln has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Kokosmehl
Kokosmehl*. *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft Kann Spuren von Schalenfrüchten und Erdnüssen enthalten.
Kokosraspeln
Kokosraspel
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kokosmehl or Kokosraspeln?
Overall, Kokosmehl has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kokosmehl has fewer calories: 361 kcal versus 635 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kokosraspeln has less sugar: 7.6 g versus 18 g per 100 g.