Comparison
Kokosraspeln vs Farinha de coco
Overall, Farinha de coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kokosraspeln | Farinha de coco |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 635 kcal | 346 kcal |
| Fat | 59 g | 11 g |
| Saturated fat | 55.7 g | 11 g |
| Sugars | 7.6 g | 21 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 16.3 g | 34 g |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 22 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Farinha de coco has 46% fewer calories (346 kcal vs 635 kcal).
- Farinha de coco has 81% less fat (11 g vs 59 g).
- Farinha de coco has 80% less saturated fat (11 g vs 55.7 g).
- Kokosraspeln has 64% less sugar (7.6 g vs 21 g).
- Farinha de coco has 52% more fiber (34 g vs 16.3 g).
- Farinha de coco has 70% more protein (22 g vs 6.7 g).
- Kokosraspeln has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Kokosraspeln
Kokosraspel
Farinha de coco
Farine de Coco
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kokosraspeln or Farinha de coco?
Overall, Farinha de coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Farinha de coco has fewer calories: 346 kcal versus 635 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kokosraspeln has less sugar: 7.6 g versus 21 g per 100 g.