Comparison
Kokosmehl vs Farinha de coco
Overall, Kokosmehl has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kokosmehl | Farinha de coco |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 360 kcal | 346 kcal |
| Fat | 14 g | 11 g |
| Saturated fat | 13 g | 11 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 21 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 18 g | 34 g |
| Protein | 35 g | 22 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Lupin | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Farinha de coco has 21% less fat (11 g vs 14 g).
- Farinha de coco has 15% less saturated fat (11 g vs 13 g).
- Kokosmehl has 86% less sugar (3 g vs 21 g).
- Farinha de coco has 47% more fiber (34 g vs 18 g).
- Kokosmehl has 37% more protein (35 g vs 22 g).
- Kokosmehl has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Kokosmehl lists: Lupin.
Ingredients
Kokosmehl
Kokosmehl* teilentfettet *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft Kann Spuren von Soja, Mandel, Nüssen, Sesam und Lupine enthalten.
Farinha de coco
Farine de Coco
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kokosmehl or Farinha de coco?
Overall, Kokosmehl has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Farinha de coco has fewer calories: 346 kcal versus 360 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kokosmehl has less sugar: 3 g versus 21 g per 100 g.