Comparison
Kokosmehl vs Kokosraspeln
Overall, Kokosmehl has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kokosmehl | Kokosraspeln |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 360 kcal | 635 kcal |
| Fat | 14 g | 59 g |
| Saturated fat | 13 g | 55.7 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 7.6 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 18 g | 16.3 g |
| Protein | 35 g | 6.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Lupin | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kokosmehl has 43% fewer calories (360 kcal vs 635 kcal).
- Kokosmehl has 76% less fat (14 g vs 59 g).
- Kokosmehl has 77% less saturated fat (13 g vs 55.7 g).
- Kokosmehl has 61% less sugar (3 g vs 7.6 g).
- Kokosmehl has 81% more protein (35 g vs 6.7 g).
- Only Kokosmehl lists: Lupin.
Ingredients
Kokosmehl
Kokosmehl* teilentfettet *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft Kann Spuren von Soja, Mandel, Nüssen, Sesam und Lupine enthalten.
Kokosraspeln
Kokosraspel
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kokosmehl or Kokosraspeln?
Overall, Kokosmehl has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kokosmehl has fewer calories: 360 kcal versus 635 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kokosmehl has less sugar: 3 g versus 7.6 g per 100 g.