Kokosmilch cremig vs Hand Cooked Golden Crunch
Overall, Kokosmilch cremig has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 3.
Kokosmilch cremig
Hand Cooked Golden Crunch
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kokosmilch cremig | Hand Cooked Golden Crunch |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | e |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 185 kcal | 552 kcal |
| Fat | 18 g | 28 g |
| Saturated fat | 16.3 g | 4.9 g |
| Sugars | 1.6 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 2.2 g |
| Fiber | 5.9 g | — |
| Protein | 1.3 g | 72.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kokosmilch cremig has 66% fewer calories (185 kcal vs 552 kcal).
- Kokosmilch cremig has 36% less fat (18 g vs 28 g).
- Hand Cooked Golden Crunch has 70% less saturated fat (4.9 g vs 16.3 g).
- Hand Cooked Golden Crunch has 56% less sugar (0.7 g vs 1.6 g).
- Kokosmilch cremig has 97% less salt (0.1 g vs 2.2 g).
- Hand Cooked Golden Crunch has 98% more protein (72.9 g vs 1.3 g).
- Kokosmilch cremig has the better Nutri-Score.
- Kokosmilch cremig is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Kokosmilch cremig
Kokosnussfruchtfleisch 65%, Wasser
Hand Cooked Golden Crunch
Pork Rind, Seasoning (Rice Flour, Salt, Dextrose, Yeast Powder, Colours: Annatto, Curcumin, Paprika Extract; Flavourings, Citric Acid).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kokosmilch cremig or Hand Cooked Golden Crunch?
Overall, Kokosmilch cremig has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kokosmilch cremig has fewer calories: 185 kcal versus 552 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hand Cooked Golden Crunch has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 1.6 g per 100 g.