Comparison
Baken-Ets vs Kokosmilch cremig
Overall, Kokosmilch cremig has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Baken-Ets | Kokosmilch cremig |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 571 kcal | 185 kcal |
| Fat | 42.9 g | 18 g |
| Saturated fat | 17.9 g | 16.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1.6 g |
| Salt | 3.9 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 5.9 g |
| Protein | 50 g | 1.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kokosmilch cremig has 68% fewer calories (185 kcal vs 571 kcal).
- Kokosmilch cremig has 58% less fat (18 g vs 42.9 g).
- Baken-Ets has no sugar, while Kokosmilch cremig has 1.6 g.
- Kokosmilch cremig has 98% less salt (0.1 g vs 3.9 g).
- Kokosmilch cremig has 100% more fiber (5.9 g vs 0 g).
- Baken-Ets has 97% more protein (50 g vs 1.3 g).
- Kokosmilch cremig has the better Nutri-Score.
- Kokosmilch cremig is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Baken-Ets
FRIED PORK SKINS AND SALT
Kokosmilch cremig
Kokosnussfruchtfleisch 65%, Wasser
FAQ
Which is healthier: Baken-Ets or Kokosmilch cremig?
Overall, Kokosmilch cremig has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kokosmilch cremig has fewer calories: 185 kcal versus 571 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Baken-Ets has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.6 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Baken-Ets vs Hand Cooked Golden Crunc...
Baken-Ets vs Pork Puffs
Baken-Ets vs Baken-Ets Chicharrones H...
Baken-Ets vs Golden Crunch Crispy Lig...
Kokosmilch cremig vs Hand Cooked Golden Crunc...
Baken-Ets vs Chile lime pork rinds
Baken-Ets vs Fried pork rinds
Chile lime pork rinds vs Kokosmilch cremig