Chile lime pork rinds vs Kokosmilch cremig
Overall, Kokosmilch cremig has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chile lime pork rinds | Kokosmilch cremig |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 1 |
| Calories | 500 kcal | 185 kcal |
| Fat | 28.6 g | 18 g |
| Saturated fat | 10.7 g | 16.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1.6 g |
| Salt | 5.9 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 5.9 g |
| Protein | 64.3 g | 1.3 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kokosmilch cremig has 63% fewer calories (185 kcal vs 500 kcal).
- Kokosmilch cremig has 37% less fat (18 g vs 28.6 g).
- Chile lime pork rinds has 34% less saturated fat (10.7 g vs 16.3 g).
- Chile lime pork rinds has no sugar, while Kokosmilch cremig has 1.6 g.
- Kokosmilch cremig has 99% less salt (0.1 g vs 5.9 g).
- Kokosmilch cremig has 100% more fiber (5.9 g vs 0 g).
- Chile lime pork rinds has 98% more protein (64.3 g vs 1.3 g).
- Kokosmilch cremig has the better Nutri-Score.
- Kokosmilch cremig is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Chile lime pork rinds
Pork rind, salt, chile pepper, paprika, maltodextrin, yeast extract, citric acid, dextrose, malic acid, onion powder, tomato powder, spices, garlic powder, paprika oleoresin, distilled white vinegar, natural flavor, lime juice, lemon juice, lactic acid.
Kokosmilch cremig
Kokosnussfruchtfleisch 65%, Wasser
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chile lime pork rinds or Kokosmilch cremig?
Overall, Kokosmilch cremig has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kokosmilch cremig has fewer calories: 185 kcal versus 500 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chile lime pork rinds has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.6 g per 100 g.