Chile lime pork rinds vs Pork Puffs
Overall, Pork Puffs has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chile lime pork rinds | Pork Puffs |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 500 kcal | 532 kcal |
| Fat | 28.6 g | 27.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 10.7 g | 9.9 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 5.9 g | 5.8 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.7 g |
| Protein | 64.3 g | 71.1 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pork Puffs has 100% more fiber (0.7 g vs 0 g).
- Pork Puffs is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Chile lime pork rinds
Pork rind, salt, chile pepper, paprika, maltodextrin, yeast extract, citric acid, dextrose, malic acid, onion powder, tomato powder, spices, garlic powder, paprika oleoresin, distilled white vinegar, natural flavor, lime juice, lemon juice, lactic acid.
Pork Puffs
Pork Rind (95%), Salt, Yeast Extract.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chile lime pork rinds or Pork Puffs?
Overall, Pork Puffs has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chile lime pork rinds has fewer calories: 500 kcal versus 532 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chile lime pork rinds has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.