Comparison
Baken-Ets vs Pork Puffs
Overall, Pork Puffs has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Baken-Ets | Pork Puffs |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 571 kcal | 532 kcal |
| Fat | 42.9 g | 27.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 17.9 g | 9.9 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 3.9 g | 5.8 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.7 g |
| Protein | 50 g | 71.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pork Puffs has 35% less fat (27.8 g vs 42.9 g).
- Pork Puffs has 45% less saturated fat (9.9 g vs 17.9 g).
- Baken-Ets has 32% less salt (3.9 g vs 5.8 g).
- Pork Puffs has 100% more fiber (0.7 g vs 0 g).
- Pork Puffs has 30% more protein (71.1 g vs 50 g).
Ingredients
Baken-Ets
FRIED PORK SKINS AND SALT
Pork Puffs
Pork Rind (95%), Salt, Yeast Extract.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Baken-Ets or Pork Puffs?
Overall, Pork Puffs has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pork Puffs has fewer calories: 532 kcal versus 571 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Baken-Ets has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Baken-Ets vs Hand Cooked Golden Crunc...
Baken-Ets vs Kokosmilch cremig
Baken-Ets vs Baken-Ets Chicharrones H...
Baken-Ets vs Golden Crunch Crispy Lig...
Hand Cooked Golden Crunc... vs Pork Puffs
Baken-Ets Chicharrones H... vs Pork Puffs
Golden Crunch Crispy Lig... vs Pork Puffs
Baken-Ets vs Chile lime pork rinds