Baken-Ets vs Chile lime pork rinds
Overall, Chile lime pork rinds has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Baken-Ets | Chile lime pork rinds |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 571 kcal | 500 kcal |
| Fat | 42.9 g | 28.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 17.9 g | 10.7 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 3.9 g | 5.9 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 50 g | 64.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chile lime pork rinds has 13% fewer calories (500 kcal vs 571 kcal).
- Chile lime pork rinds has 33% less fat (28.6 g vs 42.9 g).
- Chile lime pork rinds has 40% less saturated fat (10.7 g vs 17.9 g).
- Baken-Ets has 33% less salt (3.9 g vs 5.9 g).
- Chile lime pork rinds has 22% more protein (64.3 g vs 50 g).
- Baken-Ets is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Baken-Ets
FRIED PORK SKINS AND SALT
Chile lime pork rinds
Pork rind, salt, chile pepper, paprika, maltodextrin, yeast extract, citric acid, dextrose, malic acid, onion powder, tomato powder, spices, garlic powder, paprika oleoresin, distilled white vinegar, natural flavor, lime juice, lemon juice, lactic acid.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Baken-Ets or Chile lime pork rinds?
Overall, Chile lime pork rinds has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chile lime pork rinds has fewer calories: 500 kcal versus 571 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Baken-Ets has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.