Chile lime pork rinds vs Hand Cooked Golden Crunch
Overall, Hand Cooked Golden Crunch has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Chile lime pork rinds
Hand Cooked Golden Crunch
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chile lime pork rinds | Hand Cooked Golden Crunch |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 500 kcal | 552 kcal |
| Fat | 28.6 g | 28 g |
| Saturated fat | 10.7 g | 4.9 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 5.9 g | 2.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 64.3 g | 72.9 g |
| Additives | 4 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Hand Cooked Golden Crunch has 54% less saturated fat (4.9 g vs 10.7 g).
- Chile lime pork rinds has no sugar, while Hand Cooked Golden Crunch has 0.7 g.
- Hand Cooked Golden Crunch has 62% less salt (2.2 g vs 5.9 g).
- Hand Cooked Golden Crunch has 12% more protein (72.9 g vs 64.3 g).
Ingredients
Chile lime pork rinds
Pork rind, salt, chile pepper, paprika, maltodextrin, yeast extract, citric acid, dextrose, malic acid, onion powder, tomato powder, spices, garlic powder, paprika oleoresin, distilled white vinegar, natural flavor, lime juice, lemon juice, lactic acid.
Hand Cooked Golden Crunch
Pork Rind, Seasoning (Rice Flour, Salt, Dextrose, Yeast Powder, Colours: Annatto, Curcumin, Paprika Extract; Flavourings, Citric Acid).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chile lime pork rinds or Hand Cooked Golden Crunch?
Overall, Hand Cooked Golden Crunch has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chile lime pork rinds has fewer calories: 500 kcal versus 552 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chile lime pork rinds has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.