Fried pork rinds vs Hand Cooked Golden Crunch
Overall, Hand Cooked Golden Crunch has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fried pork rinds | Hand Cooked Golden Crunch |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 571 kcal | 552 kcal |
| Fat | 42.9 g | 28 g |
| Saturated fat | 14.3 g | 4.9 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 2.7 g | 2.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 57.1 g | 72.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Hand Cooked Golden Crunch has 35% less fat (28 g vs 42.9 g).
- Hand Cooked Golden Crunch has 66% less saturated fat (4.9 g vs 14.3 g).
- Fried pork rinds has no sugar, while Hand Cooked Golden Crunch has 0.7 g.
- Hand Cooked Golden Crunch has 16% less salt (2.2 g vs 2.7 g).
- Hand Cooked Golden Crunch has 22% more protein (72.9 g vs 57.1 g).
- Fried pork rinds is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Fried pork rinds
fried pork skins, salt,
Hand Cooked Golden Crunch
Pork Rind, Seasoning (Rice Flour, Salt, Dextrose, Yeast Powder, Colours: Annatto, Curcumin, Paprika Extract; Flavourings, Citric Acid).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fried pork rinds or Hand Cooked Golden Crunch?
Overall, Hand Cooked Golden Crunch has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hand Cooked Golden Crunch has fewer calories: 552 kcal versus 571 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fried pork rinds has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.