Comparison

Kokosmilch cremig vs Fried pork rinds

Overall, Kokosmilch cremig has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientKokosmilch cremigFried pork rinds
Nutri-Score c e
NOVA group 1 3
Calories 185 kcal 571 kcal
Fat 18 g 42.9 g
Saturated fat 16.3 g 14.3 g
Sugars 1.6 g 0 g
Salt 0.1 g 2.7 g
Fiber 5.9 g 0 g
Protein 1.3 g 57.1 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Kokosmilch cremig has 68% fewer calories (185 kcal vs 571 kcal).
  • Kokosmilch cremig has 58% less fat (18 g vs 42.9 g).
  • Fried pork rinds has 12% less saturated fat (14.3 g vs 16.3 g).
  • Fried pork rinds has no sugar, while Kokosmilch cremig has 1.6 g.
  • Kokosmilch cremig has 97% less salt (0.1 g vs 2.7 g).
  • Kokosmilch cremig has 100% more fiber (5.9 g vs 0 g).
  • Fried pork rinds has 98% more protein (57.1 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Kokosmilch cremig has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Kokosmilch cremig is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Kokosmilch cremig

Kokosnussfruchtfleisch 65%, Wasser

Fried pork rinds

fried pork skins, salt,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Kokosmilch cremig or Fried pork rinds?

Overall, Kokosmilch cremig has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kokosmilch cremig has fewer calories: 185 kcal versus 571 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Fried pork rinds has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons