Kokosmilch cremig vs Fried pork rinds
Overall, Kokosmilch cremig has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kokosmilch cremig | Fried pork rinds |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | e |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 185 kcal | 571 kcal |
| Fat | 18 g | 42.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 16.3 g | 14.3 g |
| Sugars | 1.6 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 2.7 g |
| Fiber | 5.9 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 1.3 g | 57.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kokosmilch cremig has 68% fewer calories (185 kcal vs 571 kcal).
- Kokosmilch cremig has 58% less fat (18 g vs 42.9 g).
- Fried pork rinds has 12% less saturated fat (14.3 g vs 16.3 g).
- Fried pork rinds has no sugar, while Kokosmilch cremig has 1.6 g.
- Kokosmilch cremig has 97% less salt (0.1 g vs 2.7 g).
- Kokosmilch cremig has 100% more fiber (5.9 g vs 0 g).
- Fried pork rinds has 98% more protein (57.1 g vs 1.3 g).
- Kokosmilch cremig has the better Nutri-Score.
- Kokosmilch cremig is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Kokosmilch cremig
Kokosnussfruchtfleisch 65%, Wasser
Fried pork rinds
fried pork skins, salt,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kokosmilch cremig or Fried pork rinds?
Overall, Kokosmilch cremig has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kokosmilch cremig has fewer calories: 185 kcal versus 571 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fried pork rinds has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.6 g per 100 g.