Chile lime pork rinds vs Fried pork rinds
Overall, Chile lime pork rinds has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chile lime pork rinds | Fried pork rinds |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 500 kcal | 571 kcal |
| Fat | 28.6 g | 42.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 10.7 g | 14.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 5.9 g | 2.7 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 64.3 g | 57.1 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chile lime pork rinds has 13% fewer calories (500 kcal vs 571 kcal).
- Chile lime pork rinds has 33% less fat (28.6 g vs 42.9 g).
- Chile lime pork rinds has 25% less saturated fat (10.7 g vs 14.3 g).
- Fried pork rinds has 54% less salt (2.7 g vs 5.9 g).
- Chile lime pork rinds has 11% more protein (64.3 g vs 57.1 g).
- Fried pork rinds is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Chile lime pork rinds
Pork rind, salt, chile pepper, paprika, maltodextrin, yeast extract, citric acid, dextrose, malic acid, onion powder, tomato powder, spices, garlic powder, paprika oleoresin, distilled white vinegar, natural flavor, lime juice, lemon juice, lactic acid.
Fried pork rinds
fried pork skins, salt,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chile lime pork rinds or Fried pork rinds?
Overall, Chile lime pork rinds has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chile lime pork rinds has fewer calories: 500 kcal versus 571 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chile lime pork rinds has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.