Comparison
Baken-Ets vs Fried pork rinds
Overall, Fried pork rinds has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Baken-Ets | Fried pork rinds |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 571 kcal | 571 kcal |
| Fat | 42.9 g | 42.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 17.9 g | 14.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 3.9 g | 2.7 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 50 g | 57.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fried pork rinds has 20% less saturated fat (14.3 g vs 17.9 g).
- Fried pork rinds has 32% less salt (2.7 g vs 3.9 g).
- Fried pork rinds has 12% more protein (57.1 g vs 50 g).
Ingredients
Baken-Ets
FRIED PORK SKINS AND SALT
Fried pork rinds
fried pork skins, salt,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Baken-Ets or Fried pork rinds?
Overall, Fried pork rinds has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Baken-Ets has fewer calories: 571 kcal versus 571 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Baken-Ets has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.