Comparison

Fried pork rinds vs Pork Puffs

Overall, Pork Puffs has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Fried pork rinds	Pork Puffs
Nutri-Score	e	e
NOVA group	3	3
Calories	571 kcal	532 kcal
Fat	42.9 g	27.8 g
Saturated fat	14.3 g	9.9 g
Sugars	0 g	0.1 g
Salt	2.7 g	5.8 g
Fiber	0 g	0.7 g
Protein	57.1 g	71.1 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	None listed	None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Pork Puffs has 35% less fat (27.8 g vs 42.9 g).
Pork Puffs has 31% less saturated fat (9.9 g vs 14.3 g).
Fried pork rinds has 54% less salt (2.7 g vs 5.8 g).
Pork Puffs has 100% more fiber (0.7 g vs 0 g).
Pork Puffs has 20% more protein (71.1 g vs 57.1 g).

Ingredients

Fried pork rinds

fried pork skins, salt,

Pork Puffs

Pork Rind (95%), Salt, Yeast Extract.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Fried pork rinds or Pork Puffs?

Overall, Pork Puffs has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pork Puffs has fewer calories: 532 kcal versus 571 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Fried pork rinds has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Baken-Ets vs Pork Puffs Hand Cooked Golden Crunc... vs Pork Puffs Baken-Ets Chicharrones H... vs Pork Puffs Golden Crunch Crispy Lig... vs Pork Puffs Baken-Ets vs Fried pork rinds Fried pork rinds vs Hand Cooked Golden Crunc... Kokosmilch cremig vs Fried pork rinds Chile lime pork rinds vs Pork Puffs