King prawn cocktail vs Prawn Cocktail
Overall, King prawn cocktail has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | King prawn cocktail | Prawn Cocktail |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 192 kcal | 330 kcal |
| Fat | 15.2 g | 31 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.2 g | 2.3 g |
| Sugars | 2.9 g | 2.9 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 1.9 g |
| Fiber | 0.3 g | — |
| Protein | 9.1 g | 8.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Crustaceans, Eggs, Gluten, Mustard |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- King prawn cocktail has 42% fewer calories (192 kcal vs 330 kcal).
- King prawn cocktail has 51% less fat (15.2 g vs 31 g).
- King prawn cocktail has 48% less saturated fat (1.2 g vs 2.3 g).
- King prawn cocktail has 38% less salt (1.2 g vs 1.9 g).
- King prawn cocktail has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Prawn Cocktail lists: Crustaceans, Eggs, Gluten, Mustard.
Ingredients
King prawn cocktail
Not available.
Prawn Cocktail
Cooked Prawns (Crustaceans) (50%) [Water, Preservatives: Lactic Acid, Acetic Acid; Salt], Mayonnaise (40%) [Rapeseed Oil, Free Range Egg Yolk, Water, Spirit Vinegar, Salt, Sugar, Mustard, Lemon Oil], Tomato Ketchup [Tomatoes, Sugar, Spirit Vinegar, Modified Maize Starch, Salt, Barley Malt Vinegar, Spices Extract], Brandy, Black Pepper. ALLERGY ADVICE For allergens, including cereals containing gluten, see ingredients in bold.
FAQ
Which is healthier: King prawn cocktail or Prawn Cocktail?
Overall, King prawn cocktail has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
King prawn cocktail has fewer calories: 192 kcal versus 330 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
King prawn cocktail has less sugar: 2.9 g versus 2.9 g per 100 g.