Comparison

Kimchi vs PURE Snack Pear & Apple

Overall, Kimchi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 4.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientKimchiPURE Snack Pear & Apple
Nutri-Score d a
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 26 kcal 64 kcal
Fat 0.4 g 1.4 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.3 g
Sugars 2.7 g 4.9 g
Salt 4.8 g 0.2 g
Fiber 1.5 g 0.2 g
Protein 1.5 g 5.7 g
Additives00
AllergensFishEggs, Kananmuna valkuainen, Kananmunan keltuainen

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Kimchi has 59% fewer calories (26 kcal vs 64 kcal).
  • Kimchi has 75% less fat (0.4 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Kimchi has 45% less sugar (2.7 g vs 4.9 g).
  • PURE Snack Pear & Apple has 96% less salt (0.2 g vs 4.8 g).
  • Kimchi has 86% more fiber (1.5 g vs 0.2 g).
  • PURE Snack Pear & Apple has 75% more protein (5.7 g vs 1.5 g).
  • PURE Snack Pear & Apple has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Kimchi is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Kimchi lists: Fish.
  • Only PURE Snack Pear & Apple lists: Eggs, Kananmuna valkuainen, Kananmunan keltuainen.

Ingredients

Kimchi

Chinese Cabbage (pak-choil, Daikon Radish, Carrots, Spring Onions, Sea Salt, FISH SAUCÉ (Filtered Water, Sugar, Anchovy Extract), Garlic, Chili Powder, Ginger, Cayenne Pepper.

PURE Snack Pear & Apple

_Kananmunan valkuainen_ 43% (Suomi), vesi, makeuttajatiiviste (päärynä), _kananmunankeltuainen_ (Suomi), päärynä ja päärynätäysmehu (4,5%), omenasose (2,3%), sokeri, perunatärkkelys, perunaproteiini, aromit, hapate

FAQ

Which is healthier: Kimchi or PURE Snack Pear & Apple?

Overall, Kimchi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kimchi has fewer calories: 26 kcal versus 64 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kimchi has less sugar: 2.7 g versus 4.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons