Kimchi vs Soslu Zeytin
Overall, Kimchi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kimchi | Soslu Zeytin |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 41 kcal | 311 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 29.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 4.9 g |
| Sugars | 1.4 g | 0.8 g |
| Salt | 2 g | 3 g |
| Fiber | 3.2 g | 9.3 g |
| Protein | 1.4 g | 1.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kimchi has 87% fewer calories (41 kcal vs 311 kcal).
- Kimchi has 98% less fat (0.5 g vs 29.8 g).
- Kimchi has 98% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 4.9 g).
- Soslu Zeytin has 43% less sugar (0.8 g vs 1.4 g).
- Kimchi has 34% less salt (2 g vs 3 g).
- Soslu Zeytin has 66% more fiber (9.3 g vs 3.2 g).
- Kimchi has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Soslu Zeytin lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Kimchi
84% bijeli kupus*. 8% mrkva*, sol, 1,9% začini* (granulat paprike, čili, slatka paprika u prahu*), 1,7% luk* 1,5% češnjak dumbir *iz ekološkog uzgoja.
Soslu Zeytin
In Scheiben geschnittene grüne Oliven 70%, Olivenöl 15%, Sauce 15% (Paprikamark, eingelegter Knoblauch, _Walnuss_, Kümmel, Thymian, schwarzer Pfeffer).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kimchi or Soslu Zeytin?
Overall, Kimchi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kimchi has fewer calories: 41 kcal versus 311 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Soslu Zeytin has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 1.4 g per 100 g.