Kichererbsenmehl vs Harina de garbanzo
Overall, Kichererbsenmehl has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kichererbsenmehl | Harina de garbanzo |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 361 kcal | 358 kcal |
| Fat | 6.2 g | 6.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 1.1 g |
| Sugars | 2.7 g | 7.8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 13 g | 9.9 g |
| Protein | 22 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kichererbsenmehl has 65% less sugar (2.7 g vs 7.8 g).
- Kichererbsenmehl has 24% more fiber (13 g vs 9.9 g).
Ingredients
Kichererbsenmehl
Bio Kichererbsenmehl 100%
Harina de garbanzo
Harina de garbanzo (Cicer arietinum).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kichererbsenmehl or Harina de garbanzo?
Overall, Kichererbsenmehl has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Harina de garbanzo has fewer calories: 358 kcal versus 361 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kichererbsenmehl has less sugar: 2.7 g versus 7.8 g per 100 g.