Nachos vs Harina de garbanzo
Overall, Harina de garbanzo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Nachos | Harina de garbanzo |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 418 kcal | 358 kcal |
| Fat | 13 g | 6.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.1 g | 1.1 g |
| Sugars | 1.7 g | 7.8 g |
| Salt | 2.3 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 4.6 g | 9.9 g |
| Protein | 15 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Harina de garbanzo has 14% fewer calories (358 kcal vs 418 kcal).
- Harina de garbanzo has 49% less fat (6.6 g vs 13 g).
- Nachos has 78% less sugar (1.7 g vs 7.8 g).
- Harina de garbanzo has 99% less salt (0 g vs 2.3 g).
- Harina de garbanzo has 54% more fiber (9.9 g vs 4.6 g).
- Harina de garbanzo has 25% more protein (20 g vs 15 g).
- Harina de garbanzo has the better Nutri-Score.
- Harina de garbanzo is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Nachos
Kichererbsenmehl (37%), grüne und gelbe Erbsen (17%), Reismehl, Kartoffelstärke, Sonnenblumenöl, schwarze Bohnen, Salz, Zucker, Kräuter, Gewürze.
Harina de garbanzo
Harina de garbanzo (Cicer arietinum).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Nachos or Harina de garbanzo?
Overall, Harina de garbanzo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Harina de garbanzo has fewer calories: 358 kcal versus 418 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Nachos has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 7.8 g per 100 g.