Kichererbsen vs Green Olives (Slices)
Overall, Kichererbsen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kichererbsen | Green Olives (Slices) |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 101 kcal | 162 kcal |
| Fat | 1.7 g | 17 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 2.3 g |
| Protein | 5.7 g | 1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kichererbsen has 38% fewer calories (101 kcal vs 162 kcal).
- Kichererbsen has 90% less fat (1.7 g vs 17 g).
- Green Olives (Slices) has no sugar, while Kichererbsen has 3 g.
- Kichererbsen has 36% more fiber (3.6 g vs 2.3 g).
- Kichererbsen has 82% more protein (5.7 g vs 1 g).
Ingredients
Kichererbsen
Bio Kichererbsen 66%, Wasser, Meersalz
Green Olives (Slices)
Groene olijf, water, zout, zuurteregelaar (melkzuur, citroenzuur), antioxidant (ascorbinezuur).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kichererbsen or Green Olives (Slices)?
Overall, Kichererbsen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kichererbsen has fewer calories: 101 kcal versus 162 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Green Olives (Slices) has less sugar: 0 g versus 3 g per 100 g.