Rode bietjes, schijfjes vs Kichererbsen
Overall, Kichererbsen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rode bietjes, schijfjes | Kichererbsen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 29 kcal | 101 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 1.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 4.5 g | 3 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 1 g | 3.6 g |
| Protein | 0.4 g | 5.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rode bietjes, schijfjes has 71% fewer calories (29 kcal vs 101 kcal).
- Rode bietjes, schijfjes has 94% less fat (0.1 g vs 1.7 g).
- Kichererbsen has 33% less sugar (3 g vs 4.5 g).
- Kichererbsen has 72% more fiber (3.6 g vs 1 g).
- Kichererbsen has 93% more protein (5.7 g vs 0.4 g).
- Kichererbsen is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Rode bietjes, schijfjes
Beetroots 55%, water, spirit vinegar, sugar, modified corn starch, natural flavouring
Kichererbsen
Bio Kichererbsen 66%, Wasser, Meersalz
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rode bietjes, schijfjes or Kichererbsen?
Overall, Kichererbsen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rode bietjes, schijfjes has fewer calories: 29 kcal versus 101 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kichererbsen has less sugar: 3 g versus 4.5 g per 100 g.