Comparison
Kichererbsen vs Kichererbsen
Overall, Kichererbsen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kichererbsen | Kichererbsen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 125 kcal | 117 kcal |
| Fat | 2.7 g | 2.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.4 g | 1.2 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | 5.1 g | 7.6 g |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 6.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kichererbsen has 11% less fat (2.4 g vs 2.7 g).
- Kichererbsen has 67% less sugar (0.4 g vs 1.2 g).
- Kichererbsen has 33% more fiber (7.6 g vs 5.1 g).
- Kichererbsen has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Kichererbsen
Getrocknete Kichererbsen rehydrati - siert, Wasser, Speisesalz.
Kichererbsen
Kichererbsen, Wasser, Speisesalz.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kichererbsen or Kichererbsen?
Overall, Kichererbsen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kichererbsen has fewer calories: 117 kcal versus 125 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kichererbsen has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.