Kakao vs Lübecker Marzipan Rohmasse
Overall, Kakao has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kakao | Lübecker Marzipan Rohmasse |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 387 kcal | 465 kcal |
| Fat | 21 g | 27.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 13 g | 2.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 38.6 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 31 g | 6.2 g |
| Protein | 22 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kakao has 17% fewer calories (387 kcal vs 465 kcal).
- Kakao has 24% less fat (21 g vs 27.8 g).
- Lübecker Marzipan Rohmasse has 82% less saturated fat (2.3 g vs 13 g).
- Kakao has 99% less sugar (0.5 g vs 38.6 g).
- Kakao has 80% more fiber (31 g vs 6.2 g).
- Kakao has 45% more protein (22 g vs 12 g).
- Kakao is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Lübecker Marzipan Rohmasse lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Kakao
Kakaopulver 95%*, Säureregulator: Kaliumcarbonat 5%*aus biologischer Landwirtschaft.
Lübecker Marzipan Rohmasse
MANDELN* 52%, Rohrohrzucker*, Invertzuckersirup*, Wasser, Alkohol* 0,6% *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft Kann Spuren von Haselnuss und Pistazie enthalten.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kakao or Lübecker Marzipan Rohmasse?
Overall, Kakao has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kakao has fewer calories: 387 kcal versus 465 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kakao has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 38.6 g per 100 g.