Joghurt Natur 3,5 % Fett vs Buko - Typ Toskana
Overall, Joghurt Natur 3,5 % Fett has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Joghurt Natur 3,5 % Fett | Buko - Typ Toskana |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 70 kcal | 179 kcal |
| Fat | 3.5 g | 14 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.4 g | 8.9 g |
| Sugars | 5.1 g | 4.3 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 1.5 g | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 4.4 g | 7.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Joghurt Natur 3,5 % Fett has 61% fewer calories (70 kcal vs 179 kcal).
- Joghurt Natur 3,5 % Fett has 75% less fat (3.5 g vs 14 g).
- Joghurt Natur 3,5 % Fett has 73% less saturated fat (2.4 g vs 8.9 g).
- Buko - Typ Toskana has 16% less sugar (4.3 g vs 5.1 g).
- Joghurt Natur 3,5 % Fett has 83% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.9 g).
- Joghurt Natur 3,5 % Fett has 85% more fiber (1.5 g vs 0.2 g).
- Buko - Typ Toskana has 40% more protein (7.3 g vs 4.4 g).
- Joghurt Natur 3,5 % Fett has the better Nutri-Score.
- Joghurt Natur 3,5 % Fett is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Joghurt Natur 3,5 % Fett
Joghurt, 3,5% Fett
Buko - Typ Toskana
_Frischkäse_, Tomate 4,5%, Zucchini 3%, rote Paprika 2,5%, Zwiebeln, Speisesalz, Basilikum, Gewürze, Thymian
FAQ
Which is healthier: Joghurt Natur 3,5 % Fett or Buko - Typ Toskana?
Overall, Joghurt Natur 3,5 % Fett has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Joghurt Natur 3,5 % Fett has fewer calories: 70 kcal versus 179 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Buko - Typ Toskana has less sugar: 4.3 g versus 5.1 g per 100 g.