Integral Rigati vs Shin Ramyun
Overall, Integral Rigati has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 9 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Integral Rigati | Shin Ramyun |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | e |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 321 kcal | 421 kcal |
| Fat | 3 g | 14.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 6.9 g |
| Sugars | 0.9 g | 2.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 4.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 8.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Integral Rigati has 24% fewer calories (321 kcal vs 421 kcal).
- Integral Rigati has 79% less fat (3 g vs 14.3 g).
- Integral Rigati has 94% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 6.9 g).
- Integral Rigati has 64% less sugar (0.9 g vs 2.5 g).
- Integral Rigati has no salt, while Shin Ramyun has 4.1 g.
- Integral Rigati has 33% more protein (12 g vs 8.1 g).
- Integral Rigati has the better Nutri-Score.
- Integral Rigati is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Integral Rigati lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Integral Rigati
Trigo integral
Shin Ramyun
Harina en polvo, aceite de palma, sal de mesa, almidón de papa, polvo de chile, extracto de carne deshidratado, pimienta, ajo en polvo, cebolla, goma guar, alga marina
FAQ
Which is healthier: Integral Rigati or Shin Ramyun?
Overall, Integral Rigati has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Integral Rigati has fewer calories: 321 kcal versus 421 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Integral Rigati has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.