Comparison
Instant millet flakes vs Hirseflocken
Overall, Instant millet flakes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Instant millet flakes | Hirseflocken |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 363 kcal | 359 kcal |
| Fat | 2.5 g | 4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 0.3 g | 1.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.5 g | — |
| Protein | 10 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Instant millet flakes has 38% less fat (2.5 g vs 4 g).
- Instant millet flakes has 30% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 1 g).
- Instant millet flakes has 80% less sugar (0.3 g vs 1.5 g).
Ingredients
Instant millet flakes
millet flakes
Hirseflocken
Flocons de millet**. ** De production biologique suisse Peut contenir: gluten, soja.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Instant millet flakes or Hirseflocken?
Overall, Instant millet flakes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hirseflocken has fewer calories: 359 kcal versus 363 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Instant millet flakes has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.