Comparison
Instant millet flakes vs Hirseflocken
Overall, Hirseflocken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Instant millet flakes | Hirseflocken |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 363 kcal | 360 kcal |
| Fat | 2.5 g | 3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.5 g | 3 g |
| Protein | 10 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Instant millet flakes has 17% less fat (2.5 g vs 3 g).
- Hirseflocken has no sugar, while Instant millet flakes has 0.3 g.
- Hirseflocken has 17% more fiber (3 g vs 2.5 g).
- Hirseflocken has 17% more protein (12 g vs 10 g).
Ingredients
Instant millet flakes
millet flakes
Hirseflocken
flocons de millet bio (provenance: voir date)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Instant millet flakes or Hirseflocken?
Overall, Hirseflocken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hirseflocken has fewer calories: 360 kcal versus 363 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hirseflocken has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.3 g per 100 g.