Comparison
Płatki jaglane vs Hirseflocken
Overall, Hirseflocken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Płatki jaglane | Hirseflocken |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 334 kcal | 360 kcal |
| Fat | 1.5 g | 3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.8 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.9 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3.2 g | 3 g |
| Protein | 8 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Płatki jaglane has 50% less fat (1.5 g vs 3 g).
- Hirseflocken has 38% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
- Hirseflocken has no sugar, while Płatki jaglane has 0.9 g.
- Hirseflocken has 33% more protein (12 g vs 8 g).
- Hirseflocken has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Płatki jaglane
Ekologiczne płatki jaglane 100%.
Hirseflocken
flocons de millet bio (provenance: voir date)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Płatki jaglane or Hirseflocken?
Overall, Hirseflocken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Płatki jaglane has fewer calories: 334 kcal versus 360 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hirseflocken has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.