Comparison
Hirseflocken vs Hirseflocken
Overall, Hirseflocken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Hirseflocken | Hirseflocken |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 359 kcal | 360 kcal |
| Fat | 4 g | 3 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 1.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 3 g |
| Protein | 10 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Hirseflocken has 25% less fat (3 g vs 4 g).
- Hirseflocken has 50% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 1 g).
- Hirseflocken has no sugar, while Hirseflocken has 1.5 g.
- Hirseflocken has 17% more protein (12 g vs 10 g).
Ingredients
Hirseflocken
Flocons de millet**. ** De production biologique suisse Peut contenir: gluten, soja.
Hirseflocken
flocons de millet bio (provenance: voir date)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Hirseflocken or Hirseflocken?
Overall, Hirseflocken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hirseflocken has fewer calories: 359 kcal versus 360 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hirseflocken has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.