Hoşbeş Muz Kremalı Gofret vs Rulokat
Overall, Rulokat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Hoşbeş Muz Kremalı Gofret | Rulokat |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 511 kcal | 499 kcal |
| Fat | 22 g | 24 g |
| Saturated fat | 19 g | 12 g |
| Sugars | 37 g | 42 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | 1.6 g | 2.8 g |
| Protein | 5.9 g | 6.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk | Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Nuts, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rulokat has 37% less saturated fat (12 g vs 19 g).
- Hoşbeş Muz Kremalı Gofret has 12% less sugar (37 g vs 42 g).
- Rulokat has 43% more fiber (2.8 g vs 1.6 g).
- Rulokat has 13% more protein (6.8 g vs 5.9 g).
- Only Rulokat lists: Eggs, Nuts, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Hoşbeş Muz Kremalı Gofret
Enerji ve Besin Öğeleri (100g'da)/100q məhsulun qida və enerji dǝyǝ Nährwerte Pro 100 g/Pour 100 g / Per 100 g Enerji/Enerji Dǝyǝri/Energie/Energie/Energie (kJ/kcal-kC/kkal) Yağ/Yağ/Fett/Graisses/Vetten (g/q) Doymuş Yağ/Bunlardan doymuş/
Rulokat
Sugar, vegetable oils (palm), _wheat_ flour, _hazelnut_ puree 4%, whole _milk_ powder, skimmed _milk_ powder, whey powder (_milk_), albumin (_egg_), emulsifier (_soy_ lecithin), reduced-fat cocoa powder, salt, _wheat_ protein, flavourings. May contain traces of _sesame_.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Hoşbeş Muz Kremalı Gofret or Rulokat?
Overall, Rulokat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rulokat has fewer calories: 499 kcal versus 511 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hoşbeş Muz Kremalı Gofret has less sugar: 37 g versus 42 g per 100 g.