Barquilhos Chocolate vs Hoşbeş Muz Kremalı Gofret
Overall, Barquilhos Chocolate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Barquilhos Chocolate | Hoşbeş Muz Kremalı Gofret |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 493 kcal | 511 kcal |
| Fat | 22 g | 22 g |
| Saturated fat | 13 g | 19 g |
| Sugars | 36 g | 37 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.6 g |
| Protein | 4.8 g | 5.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Barquilhos Chocolate has 32% less saturated fat (13 g vs 19 g).
- Barquilhos Chocolate has no salt, while Hoşbeş Muz Kremalı Gofret has 0.6 g.
- Hoşbeş Muz Kremalı Gofret has 19% more protein (5.9 g vs 4.8 g).
- Only Hoşbeş Muz Kremalı Gofret lists: Gluten, Milk.
Ingredients
Barquilhos Chocolate
Not available.
Hoşbeş Muz Kremalı Gofret
Enerji ve Besin Öğeleri (100g'da)/100q məhsulun qida və enerji dǝyǝ Nährwerte Pro 100 g/Pour 100 g / Per 100 g Enerji/Enerji Dǝyǝri/Energie/Energie/Energie (kJ/kcal-kC/kkal) Yağ/Yağ/Fett/Graisses/Vetten (g/q) Doymuş Yağ/Bunlardan doymuş/
FAQ
Which is healthier: Barquilhos Chocolate or Hoşbeş Muz Kremalı Gofret?
Overall, Barquilhos Chocolate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Barquilhos Chocolate has fewer calories: 493 kcal versus 511 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Barquilhos Chocolate has less sugar: 36 g versus 37 g per 100 g.