Góralki orzechove vs Hoşbeş Muz Kremalı Gofret
Overall, Góralki orzechove has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Góralki orzechove | Hoşbeş Muz Kremalı Gofret |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 552 kcal | 511 kcal |
| Fat | 33 g | 22 g |
| Saturated fat | 19 g | 19 g |
| Sugars | 35 g | 37 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | 5 g | 1.6 g |
| Protein | 7 g | 5.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Hoşbeş Muz Kremalı Gofret has 33% less fat (22 g vs 33 g).
- Góralki orzechove has 68% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.6 g).
- Góralki orzechove has 68% more fiber (5 g vs 1.6 g).
- Góralki orzechove has 16% more protein (7 g vs 5.9 g).
- Only Hoşbeş Muz Kremalı Gofret lists: Gluten, Milk.
Ingredients
Góralki orzechove
Not available.
Hoşbeş Muz Kremalı Gofret
Enerji ve Besin Öğeleri (100g'da)/100q məhsulun qida və enerji dǝyǝ Nährwerte Pro 100 g/Pour 100 g / Per 100 g Enerji/Enerji Dǝyǝri/Energie/Energie/Energie (kJ/kcal-kC/kkal) Yağ/Yağ/Fett/Graisses/Vetten (g/q) Doymuş Yağ/Bunlardan doymuş/
FAQ
Which is healthier: Góralki orzechove or Hoşbeş Muz Kremalı Gofret?
Overall, Góralki orzechove has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hoşbeş Muz Kremalı Gofret has fewer calories: 511 kcal versus 552 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Góralki orzechove has less sugar: 35 g versus 37 g per 100 g.