Haché au saumon vs Tuna Burgers
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Haché au saumon | Tuna Burgers |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 291 kcal | 199 kcal |
| Fat | 23 g | 10 g |
| Saturated fat | 3 g | 1.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 2.1 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | 0.6 g | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 16 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Fish, Gluten, Saumon Atlantique | Eggs, Fish, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tuna Burgers has 32% fewer calories (199 kcal vs 291 kcal).
- Tuna Burgers has 57% less fat (10 g vs 23 g).
- Tuna Burgers has 53% less saturated fat (1.4 g vs 3 g).
- Haché au saumon has 67% less sugar (0.7 g vs 2.1 g).
- Haché au saumon has 35% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.2 g).
- Haché au saumon is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Haché au saumon lists: Saumon Atlantique.
Ingredients
Haché au saumon
_Saumon Atlantique_ ASC 76 %, huiles végétales (colza et tournesol en proportion variable), eau, oignon, protéine de _blé_ texturée déshydratée (protéine de _blé_, farine de _blé_), échalote, flocon de pomme de terre, ciboulette 1,2%, _oeuf_ entier en poudre, sel, poivre noir. Peut contenir des traces de soja, céleri, mollusques, lait.
Tuna Burgers
_Atum_ (52%), água, óleo vegetal de girassol, pão ralado (contém _glúten_), _farinha de trigo_, cebola, _ovo em pó_, açúcar, alho em pó, sal, salsa, espessante (goma de guar).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Haché au saumon or Tuna Burgers?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tuna Burgers has fewer calories: 199 kcal versus 291 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Haché au saumon has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 2.1 g per 100 g.