Grovhakket leverpostej vs Hamburgerryg
Overall, Hamburgerryg has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Grovhakket leverpostej | Hamburgerryg |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 239 kcal | 119 kcal |
| Fat | 18 g | 3.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.7 g | 1.3 g |
| Sugars | 1.4 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 1.8 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 22 g |
| Additives | 3 | 4 |
| Allergens | Fish, Gluten, Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Hamburgerryg has 50% fewer calories (119 kcal vs 239 kcal).
- Hamburgerryg has 81% less fat (3.4 g vs 18 g).
- Hamburgerryg has 81% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 6.7 g).
- Hamburgerryg has no sugar, while Grovhakket leverpostej has 1.4 g.
- Grovhakket leverpostej has 28% less salt (1.3 g vs 1.8 g).
- Hamburgerryg has 41% more protein (22 g vs 13 g).
- Hamburgerryg has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Grovhakket leverpostej lists: Fish, Gluten, Milk.
Ingredients
Grovhakket leverpostej
Griselever 33%, grisespæk, vand, hvedemel, skummetmælkspulver, løg, salt, ansjoser, krydderier, konserveringsmiddel: sorbinsyre, antioxidant: natriumascorbat, stabilisator: E451.
Hamburgerryg
Grisefilet (97%), salt, stabilisator (carrageenan), druesukker, kaliumchlorid, antioxidant (natriumascorbat), konserveringsmiddel (natriumnitrit).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Grovhakket leverpostej or Hamburgerryg?
Overall, Hamburgerryg has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hamburgerryg has fewer calories: 119 kcal versus 239 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hamburgerryg has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.4 g per 100 g.