Great Value Frozen Wild Caught Pacific Whiting Skin-On Fillets, 2 lb vs Filets de merlan
Overall, Filets de merlan has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Great Value Frozen Wild Caught Pacific Whiting Skin-On Fillets, 2 lb
Filets de merlan
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Great Value Frozen Wild Caug... | Filets de merlan |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 100 kcal | 72 kcal |
| Fat | 1.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 21 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filets de merlan has 28% fewer calories (72 kcal vs 100 kcal).
- Filets de merlan has 67% less fat (0.5 g vs 1.5 g).
- Filets de merlan has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Great Value Frozen Wild Caught Pacific Whiting Skin-On Fillets, 2 lb has 19% more protein (21 g vs 17 g).
Ingredients
Great Value Frozen Wild Caught Pacific Whiting Skin-On Fillets, 2 lb
PACIFIC _WHITING_ FILLETS
Filets de merlan
Filets de merlan (Merlangius merlangus).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Great Value Frozen Wild Caught Pacific Whiting Skin-On Fillets, 2 lb or Filets de merlan?
Overall, Filets de merlan has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filets de merlan has fewer calories: 72 kcal versus 100 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Great Value Frozen Wild Caught Pacific Whiting Skin-On Fillets, 2 lb has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.