Comparison

Great Value Frozen Wild Caught Pacific Whiting Skin-On Fillets, 2 lb vs Filet de merlan

Overall, Filet de merlan has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientGreat Value Frozen Wild Caug...Filet de merlan
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group — 1
Calories 100 kcal 80 kcal
Fat 1.5 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.1 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.2 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 21 g 19 g
Additives00
AllergensFishFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filet de merlan has 20% fewer calories (80 kcal vs 100 kcal).
  • Filet de merlan has 67% less fat (0.5 g vs 1.5 g).

Ingredients

Great Value Frozen Wild Caught Pacific Whiting Skin-On Fillets, 2 lb

PACIFIC _WHITING_ FILLETS

Filet de merlan

Filet de merlan (Merlangius merlangus),

FAQ

Which is healthier: Great Value Frozen Wild Caught Pacific Whiting Skin-On Fillets, 2 lb or Filet de merlan?

Overall, Filet de merlan has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filet de merlan has fewer calories: 80 kcal versus 100 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Great Value Frozen Wild Caught Pacific Whiting Skin-On Fillets, 2 lb has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons