Comparison
Grano saraceno vs Kasza Gryczana
Overall, Kasza Gryczana has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Grano saraceno | Kasza Gryczana |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 363 kcal | 350 kcal |
| Fat | 2.9 g | 3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 5.8 g | 6 g |
| Protein | 13.2 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kasza Gryczana has 50% less sugar (1 g vs 2 g).
Ingredients
Grano saraceno
Not available.
Kasza Gryczana
Kasza gryczana prażona.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Grano saraceno or Kasza Gryczana?
Overall, Kasza Gryczana has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kasza Gryczana has fewer calories: 350 kcal versus 363 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kasza Gryczana has less sugar: 1 g versus 2 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Kasza gryczana niepalona vs Kasza Gryczana
Kasza gryczana prażona vs Grano saraceno
Grano saraceno vs Kasza gryczana prażona
Kasza gryczana niepalona vs Grano saraceno
Makfa grechka yormasi 8... vs Kasza Gryczana
Makfa grechka yormasi 8... vs Grano saraceno
Grykiai vs Kasza Gryczana
Grano saraceno vs Grykiai