Gran mix vs Zuppa di montagna con roveja
Overall, Zuppa di montagna con roveja has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Gran mix
Zuppa di montagna con roveja
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Gran mix | Zuppa di montagna con roveja |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 351 kcal | 328 kcal |
| Fat | 1.4 g | 1.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 1.7 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.6 g | 9.6 g |
| Protein | 8 g | 15.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Zuppa di montagna con roveja has 73% more fiber (9.6 g vs 2.6 g).
- Zuppa di montagna con roveja has 50% more protein (15.9 g vs 8 g).
- Zuppa di montagna con roveja has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Zuppa di montagna con roveja lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Gran mix
riso ribe parboiled 70%, grano saraceno 20%, miglio 10%.
Zuppa di montagna con roveja
Farro perlato, Orzo perlato, Roveja di Civita di Cascia decorticata, Lenticchia, Cicerchia decorticata.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Gran mix or Zuppa di montagna con roveja?
Overall, Zuppa di montagna con roveja has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Zuppa di montagna con roveja has fewer calories: 328 kcal versus 351 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Gran mix has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.