Comparison

Golden Grahams vs Smacks

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientGolden GrahamsSmacks
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 378 kcal 377 kcal
Fat 3.3 g 1.6 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 0.3 g
Sugars 24.5 g 34 g
Salt 1 g 0 g
Fiber 6.5 g 5 g
Protein 6.9 g 7.1 g
Additives20
AllergensGlutenGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Smacks has 52% less fat (1.6 g vs 3.3 g).
  • Golden Grahams has 28% less sugar (24.5 g vs 34 g).
  • Smacks has 98% less salt (0 g vs 1 g).
  • Golden Grahams has 23% more fiber (6.5 g vs 5 g).

Ingredients

Golden Grahams

BLÉ complet 35,7 %, semoule de maïs, sucre, sirop de glucose, sirop de sucre inverti, dextrose, amidon de BLÉ, huile de tournesol, carbonate de calcium, poudre à lever : bicarbonate de sodium ; mélasse, sel, fer, arôme naturel, vitamines B3, B5, B9, B6, B2. Peut contenir du LAIT.

Smacks

Blé (54%), sucre, sirop de glucose. VITAMINES ET MINÉRAUX: Niacine, fer, vitamine B6, riboflavine, thiamine, acide folique, vitamine D, vitamine B12.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Golden Grahams or Smacks?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Smacks has fewer calories: 377 kcal versus 378 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Golden Grahams has less sugar: 24.5 g versus 34 g per 100 g.

More comparisons