Comparison

Gluten frit pour vegetariens "poulet" vs Shawarma

Overall, Shawarma has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientGluten frit pour vegetariens...Shawarma
Nutri-Score c a
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 114 kcal 130 kcal
Fat 4.2 g 1.1 g
Saturated fat 1 g 0.3 g
Sugars 1 g 0.5 g
Salt 1.7 g 0.9 g
Fiber — 4 g
Protein 14.7 g 22 g
Additives00
AllergensGluten, SoybeansGluten, Mustard, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Gluten frit pour vegetariens "poulet" has 12% fewer calories (114 kcal vs 130 kcal).
  • Shawarma has 74% less fat (1.1 g vs 4.2 g).
  • Shawarma has 70% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 1 g).
  • Shawarma has 50% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1 g).
  • Shawarma has 48% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Shawarma has 33% more protein (22 g vs 14.7 g).
  • Shawarma has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Shawarma lists: Mustard.

Ingredients

Gluten frit pour vegetariens "poulet"

Gluten 65%, eau, sauce de soja (soja, farine de blé tendre, sucre, sel), sucre, sel

Shawarma

Water, plant protein (soy, wheat) (16%), soy flour, wheat flour, corn starch, flavourings (contains mustard), spices, barley malt, yeast extract, salt, vitamin B12.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Gluten frit pour vegetariens "poulet" or Shawarma?

Overall, Shawarma has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Gluten frit pour vegetariens "poulet" has fewer calories: 114 kcal versus 130 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Shawarma has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons