Girolles vs Cèpes déshydratés pot
Overall, Girolles has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Girolles | Cèpes déshydratés pot |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 19 kcal | 301 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 3.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 6.1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3.1 g | 23 g |
| Protein | 1.4 g | 28 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Girolles has 94% fewer calories (19 kcal vs 301 kcal).
- Girolles has 85% less fat (0.5 g vs 3.4 g).
- Girolles has 75% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.4 g).
- Girolles has 90% less sugar (0.6 g vs 6.1 g).
- Cèpes déshydratés pot has 87% more fiber (23 g vs 3.1 g).
- Cèpes déshydratés pot has 95% more protein (28 g vs 1.4 g).
Ingredients
Girolles
Girolle (Cantharellus cibarius).
Cèpes déshydratés pot
Cèpes séchés (boletus edulis, boletus aereus, boletus pinicola, boletus reticulatus).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Girolles or Cèpes déshydratés pot?
Overall, Girolles has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Girolles has fewer calories: 19 kcal versus 301 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Girolles has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 6.1 g per 100 g.