Comparison

Girolles vs Cèpes déshydratés pot

Overall, Girolles has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientGirollesCèpes déshydratés pot
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 1 1
Calories 19 kcal 301 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 3.4 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.4 g
Sugars 0.6 g 6.1 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 3.1 g 23 g
Protein 1.4 g 28 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Girolles has 94% fewer calories (19 kcal vs 301 kcal).
  • Girolles has 85% less fat (0.5 g vs 3.4 g).
  • Girolles has 75% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.4 g).
  • Girolles has 90% less sugar (0.6 g vs 6.1 g).
  • Cèpes déshydratés pot has 87% more fiber (23 g vs 3.1 g).
  • Cèpes déshydratés pot has 95% more protein (28 g vs 1.4 g).

Ingredients

Girolles

Girolle (Cantharellus cibarius).

Cèpes déshydratés pot

Cèpes séchés (boletus edulis, boletus aereus, boletus pinicola, boletus reticulatus).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Girolles or Cèpes déshydratés pot?

Overall, Girolles has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Girolles has fewer calories: 19 kcal versus 301 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Girolles has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 6.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons