Garde du Corps - Shot bio pressé à froid vs Haferdrink
Overall, Garde du Corps - Shot bio pressé à froid has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Garde du Corps - Shot bio pr... | Haferdrink |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 58 kcal | 29 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 8.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 0.9 g | 0.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten, Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Haferdrink has 50% fewer calories (29 kcal vs 58 kcal).
- Garde du Corps - Shot bio pressé à froid has 50% less fat (0.5 g vs 1 g).
- Haferdrink has 94% less sugar (0.5 g vs 8.3 g).
- Haferdrink has 100% more fiber (1 g vs 0 g).
- Garde du Corps - Shot bio pressé à froid has the better Nutri-Score.
- Garde du Corps - Shot bio pressé à froid is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Haferdrink lists: Gluten, Nuts.
Ingredients
Garde du Corps - Shot bio pressé à froid
Pomme 56,5%; Ananas 25%, citron vert 8%, curcuma 5%, gingembre 5%, Piment de Cayenne 0.4% Ingrédients Produits issus de l'agriculture biologique
Haferdrink
Wasser, Hafer (9%), Inulin, Sonnenblumenöl mit hohem Fettsäuregehalt, Calciumcarbonat, Meersalz, Stabilisator (Gellan), Vitamine (Riboflavin, Vitamin B12, Vitamin D). Kann SCHALENFRÜCHTE enthalten.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Garde du Corps - Shot bio pressé à froid or Haferdrink?
Overall, Garde du Corps - Shot bio pressé à froid has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Haferdrink has fewer calories: 29 kcal versus 58 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Haferdrink has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 8.3 g per 100 g.